On 9/19/16, Paul B Mahol <one...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 9/19/16, Carl Eugen Hoyos <ceffm...@gmail.com> wrote: >> 2016-09-19 14:02 GMT+02:00 Clement Boesch <u...@pkh.me>: >>> On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 01:32:54PM +0200, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: >>>> Hi! >>>> >>>> Attached patch fixes the aspect ratio for the sample from >>>> ticket #5325 / #2125. >>>> >>>> The fate test changes because the fate sample was written >>>> by FFmpeg with an incorrect aspect ratio. >>>> >>>> Please comment, Carl Eugen >>> >>>> From 0553b0adfee87401854f0313dbcf386f2fb7ae68 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >>>> From: Carl Eugen Hoyos <ceho...@ag.or.at> >>>> Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2016 13:30:06 +0200 >>>> Subject: [PATCH] lavf/mov: Read aspect ratio from ares atom for dnxhd. >>>> >>> >>>> Fixes ticket #2125. >>>> Fixes ticket #5325. >>> >>> It fixes aspect ratio from samples from these tickets, it looks >>> unrelated >>> to the original issue. >> >> We seem to have very different interpretations of "unrelated" but changed >> locally to "Fixes aspect ratio of sample in ticket ...." > > Maybe this patch with above locally changed text is correct. > > But it does change nothing with sample from ticket #5325. As that sample > have same sar as before this patch. > > So it is another lie. >
Ignore that one above, patck with corrected text is ok. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
