2016-09-20 18:47 GMT+02:00 Paul B Mahol <one...@gmail.com>: > On 9/20/16, Carl Eugen Hoyos <ceffm...@gmail.com> wrote: >> 2016-09-20 17:42 GMT+02:00 Paul B Mahol <one...@gmail.com>: >>> On 9/20/16, Carl Eugen Hoyos <ceffm...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> 2016-09-20 17:26 GMT+02:00 Paul B Mahol <one...@gmail.com>: >>>>> On 9/20/16, Carl Eugen Hoyos <ceffm...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> 2016-09-19 13:28 GMT+02:00 Carl Eugen Hoyos <ceho...@ag.or.at>: >>>>>>> Hi! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> We read a display aspect ratio from ARES atom because of several >>>>>>> user-provided samples, I believe it makes sense to also write the >>>>>>> width value into the ares atom depending on the aspect ratio. >>>>>> >>>>>> Ping. >>>>> >>>>> What about height? >>>> >>>> I thought height is already set correctly, is that wrong? >>> >>> So, height is not rescaled, but width is? >> >> It is rescaled for interlaced video iirc. >> >>> This does not make sense. >> >> What do you suggest? > > Please stop sending incorrect patches.
Please be slightly more constructive: How can I reproduce the issue you see with the patch I sent? Carl Eugen _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
