On Mon, 3 Oct 2016 01:51:25 +0200 Carl Eugen Hoyos <ceho...@ag.or.at> wrote:
> From 35bf44b909658864c9e8cca8dbc855dbde1e1ef5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Carl Eugen Hoyos <ceho...@ag.or.at> > Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2016 01:41:37 +0200 > Subject: [PATCH] doc/platform: Mention musl where x86_32 is not supported. > > --- > doc/platform.texi | 6 ++++++ > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/doc/platform.texi b/doc/platform.texi > index 21b135f..3404407 100644 > --- a/doc/platform.texi > +++ b/doc/platform.texi > @@ -77,6 +77,12 @@ optimized assembly functions. > @uref{http://www.finkproject.org/, Fink}, > @uref{https://mxcl.github.com/homebrew/, Homebrew} > or @uref{http://www.macports.org, MacPorts} can easily provide it. > > +@section musl > + > +Compilation with @uref{http://www.musl-libc.org/, musl} on x86-64 is supposed > +to work out-of-the-box. > +Do not compile FFmpeg with musl on x86_32, random crashes have to be > expected. > + > > @chapter DOS > You could mention that this is due to FFmpeg violating the ABI (apparently). _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel