2016-09-16 15:07 GMT+08:00 Michael Niedermayer <mich...@niedermayer.cc>:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 05:53:58PM -0800, Lou Logan wrote: > > On Wed, 7 Sep 2016 14:27:07 +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > > > > yes one can ignore it but its alot more usefull if people keep in > > > mind that theres patchwork. > > > > The patch submission checklist is lengthy. > > > > I'm fine with an addition somewhere in doc/developer pointing out that > > it exists and how to use it if the patch submitter wants to, but I don't > > think it needs to be in the checklist. > > where should it be put / where would you suggest to put it ? > I think this is very useful. Guys, what's the next step? > > [...] > -- > Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB > > Many that live deserve death. And some that die deserve life. Can you give > it to them? Then do not be too eager to deal out death in judgement. For > even the very wise cannot see all ends. -- Gandalf > > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel > > _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
