On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 10:06:54AM +0200, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: > 2016-09-05 11:12 GMT+02:00 Carl Eugen Hoyos <ceffm...@gmail.com>: > > 2016-09-05 10:26 GMT+02:00 Paul B Mahol <one...@gmail.com>: > >> On 9/5/16, Carl Eugen Hoyos <ceffm...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >>> New patch attached. > >> > >> It seems this patch disables check for all cases when experimental is > >> enabled, > >> but check for overflow in only one case. > > > > I am not sure I understand: > > Do you mean I missed a case where an overflow is now (after the patch) > > possible (but wasn't before) or do you mean there are formats after the > > patch that allow truncation and formats that do not allow it? > > Ping.
i didnt look at the code but from the diff it seems what was meant was that bytestream + n could point outside the array that is indeed (suprising to many) undefined, you dont need to do bytestream[n] [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB it is not once nor twice but times without number that the same ideas make their appearance in the world. -- Aristotle
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
