On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 10:06:54AM +0200, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> 2016-09-05 11:12 GMT+02:00 Carl Eugen Hoyos <ceffm...@gmail.com>:
> > 2016-09-05 10:26 GMT+02:00 Paul B Mahol <one...@gmail.com>:
> >> On 9/5/16, Carl Eugen Hoyos <ceffm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >>> New patch attached.
> >>
> >> It seems this patch disables check for all cases when experimental is 
> >> enabled,
> >> but check for overflow in only one case.
> >
> > I am not sure I understand:
> > Do you mean I missed a case where an overflow is now (after the patch)
> > possible (but wasn't before) or do you mean there are formats after the
> > patch that allow truncation and formats that do not allow it?
> Ping.

i didnt look at the code but from the diff it seems what was
meant was that bytestream + n could point outside the array
that is indeed (suprising to many) undefined, you dont need to do

Michael     GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

it is not once nor twice but times without number that the same ideas make
their appearance in the world. -- Aristotle

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

ffmpeg-devel mailing list

Reply via email to