Sorry about the second patch I sent. This option is for flexibility since some apps may not want to use the hidden atoms.
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 1:44 PM, Robert Krüger <email@example.com> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 9:54 PM, Dave Rice <d...@dericed.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Oct 13, 2016, at 1:56 PM, Hendrik Leppkes <h.lepp...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > Am 13.10.2016 19:03 schrieb "liangsi" <liangs...@gmail.com>: > > >> > > >> --- > > >> libavformat/isom.h | 1 + > > >> libavformat/mov.c | 5 ++++- > > >> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > >> > > > > > > Can you elaborate on the reasons of why someone would want this? > > Preferably > > > in the commit message for future consideration. > > > > Shouldn't using the moov atom that is not detected within a free atom be > > the default? Can you elaborate on the reasons of why someone wouldn't > want > > this? > > Dave > > > > +1 > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > firstname.lastname@example.org > http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel > _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list email@example.com http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel