On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 08:31:23PM +0000, Jay wrote: > Thank you for the feedback. I have been trying to get RTSPS cert validation > incorporated for several weeks. I would greatly appreciate someone on the > core team helping me guide this to completion. Please find your questions > answered below. > > > the get_file_handle extensions should be in a spererate patch than > > the rtsp changes > > I am process agnostic, but the RTSP changes are dependent on the TLS > changes. There is a check for peer addr in RTSP that is based on the file > descriptor.
The TLS changes do not depend on the RTSP changes, they can be in a seperate patch, applied before. TLS and RTSP are seperate "modules" changes to them are cleaner if split > > > also is it safe for all to use the input file handle that way ? > > for example if one used a fifo the input state would not match the > > relevant output neccessarily > > I do not think the peer addr check is necessary. My goal is a minimal > patch, making RTSPS work with basic TLS options. Is that the only use of the file handle ? [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB Complexity theory is the science of finding the exact solution to an approximation. Benchmarking OTOH is finding an approximation of the exact
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list firstname.lastname@example.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel