On 23.10.2016 20:18, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: > 2016-10-23 12:14 GMT+02:00 Andreas Cadhalpun > <andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com>: > >> I also don't like adding emms_c in various places, but I don't see a >> realistic alternative > > (+1!) > >> other than not fixing the problem. And I think that would be worse >> than this patch set. > > I don't (strongly) disagree but could you elaborate on why this would > be such a bad alternative?
For one thing FFmpeg shouldn't rely on undefined behavior (a theoretical issue) and for another thing it should work with musl libc (a practical problem). I think not fixing the latter is bad for our users. Best regards, Andreas _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
