> Back to the review: From first glance, the libturing codec/library (or the > executable only???) seems to have speed presets. Why are these not > exposed to the libavcodec user?
All options, including the speed presets, can be specified using -turing-params (e.g. -turing-params speed=value). The reason why we decided to go for this option is because we want to be as less invasive as possible so that if we decide to change the name for a given option the changes will be transparent to FFmpeg. Matteo Naccari > -----Original Message----- > From: ffmpeg-devel [mailto:ffmpeg-devel-boun...@ffmpeg.org] On Behalf > Of Moritz Barsnick > Sent: 19 November 2016 13:29 > To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches <ffmpeg- > de...@ffmpeg.org> > Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Added the interface for the Turing > codec > > On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 20:15:30 +0100, wm4 wrote: > > This lib has a really weird API... > > I can't judge the algorithms or the development direction and stuff - I'm sure > it's all state of the art. But the API sure gives me goosebumps, and I don't > mean the sexy feelgood type. > > Sure, it has all the flexibility, but also almost all the disadvantages of > calling an > external program. This makes it look so much like a proof of concept. > > But I'm sure that's not the point. If it turns out to be here to stay, to > compete > with x265 in one or the other way, it's probably worth integrating. > > Back to the review: From first glance, the libturing codec/library (or the > executable only???) seems to have speed presets. Why are these not > exposed to the libavcodec user? > > Furthermore: Documentation is missing. > > £0.02, > Moritz > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
