On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 09:14:15AM -0500, compn wrote: [...] > so michael, my advice to you is to just OK the patch and deal with > ffserver later... if enough users come back to complain about its > demise. i feel that this discussion is going no where if both sides are > unable to come to a compromise.
I do not block the patch, i did not object to it. And iam not going to kill anyone if its applied, it wont make me happy if its applied no i would prefer a different path but thats my oppinion. I did work on ffserver yes and i probably will continue as long as its easy to work on it. I find the tool interresting About approving or rejecting the patch, ffserver has a maintainer. He is the one to make this hard decission, if a clear decission is needed. Reynaldo is a reasonable person one can talk with [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB Never trust a computer, one day, it may think you are the virus. -- Compn
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
