2016-12-10 23:59 GMT+01:00 James Almer <jamr...@gmail.com>: >>> Again, I'm against this. This is not news entry worthy. >> >> Then please revert the configure change: >> This is (by far) the biggest change in configure behaviour since forever, >> this has to be communicated and this was the condition for the patch. > > I don't think reverting an (allegedly wanted and beneficial) change just
What does "wanted" mean in this context? The change was reviewed and it was ok with a Changelog and a news entry. The patch was applied, so please add the news entry. > because you wont accept it unless it has its own news entry makes sense > or is even fair to the person that wrote it and submitted it. > >> >>> A line can be added to the next release news entry announcement, or >>> to the RELEASE_NOTES files, but not alone. >> >> If you care, add it to the release notes, but this cannot replace the >> news entry. > > The RELEASE_NOTES mention is the only thing that's a must for this, > aside from the Changelog entry. I disagree but please feel free to add this to release notes if you want. The news entry is needed for this change. Carl Eugen _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
