On 3 April 2017 at 20:04, Paul B Mahol <one...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 4/3/17, Ricardo Constantino <wiia...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 3 April 2017 at 19:58, Paul B Mahol <one...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> > >> Yes, but that conflict with expand behaviour. > >> > >> > > How so? Still works fine with squared pixels: > > $ ffmpeg -f lavfi -i "color=s=hd720" -vf pad=aspect=4/3 -vframes 1 -f > null > > - -v verbose 2>&1 | grep Parsed_pad > > [Parsed_pad_0 @ 000001c953343940] w:1280 h:720 -> w:1280 h:960 x:0 y:0 > > color:0x000000FF > > I mean this: > > mpv ~/Videos/derf/akiyo_cif.y4m -vf lavfi="[setsar=40/33],expand= > aspect=16/9" > > mpv ~/Videos/derf/akiyo_cif.y4m -vf > lavfi="[setsar=40/33,pad=x=(ow-iw)/2:y=(oh-ih)/2:aspect=16/9]" > > Gives different padding when using div instead of mul. > > Oh, correct. mpv's expand also worked wrong with non-square pixels. That's exactly why I had the idea to experiment with div instead of mul and that did the proper expand/pad. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
