On Sat, May 6, 2017 at 9:36 PM, Ronald S. Bultje <rsbul...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Muhammad, > > On Sat, May 6, 2017 at 10:13 AM, Muhammad Faiz <mfc...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 11:22 PM, Nicolas George <geo...@nsup.org> wrote: >> > Le sextidi 16 floréal, an CCXXV, Muhammad Faiz a écrit : >> >> But if documentation >> >> says that data should be aligned to 4-bytes but I align it to >> >> 32-bytes, then there are no violations at all. So what's wrong with >> >> this patch? >> > >> > Useless code performing wasteful operations in speed-critical sections. >> >> This is not speed-critical section. > > > Not in this case, no. But I believe we have multiple issues in this area > and some of the affected areas _are_ speed-critical.
I guess, those speed-critical areas are video frames. Because the data is larger. > > Plus, we like speed even if it's pointless. There's no problem with that. But it should not generate crash. Thanks. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel