On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 8:19 AM, James Almer <jamr...@gmail.com> wrote: > Is mxf as output needed for this?
mxf was one of the (relatively few) number of muxers I knew of that would utilize the provided time base. It's not strictly needed. > If not, the framemd5() or framecrc() > fate functions (which use the muxers of the same name) would be a better > test. Those report the output timebase in a quick and easily readable way. Thanks for pointing that out! I didn't know they reported the time base in addition to the MD5 of the frames. I've attached a patch that changes the fate test to use framemd5. Please review.
0001-fate-use-framemd5-for-time_base-testing.patch
Description: Binary data
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
