2017-06-15 21:23 GMT+02:00 Nicolas George <geo...@nsup.org>: > Le septidi 27 prairial, an CCXXV, Thomas Mundt a écrit : > > Hmm, before rewriting and sending this patch I asked if it would have a > > chance to be pushed just to fix the ticket which is open for a very long > > time. Your answer gave me the assumtion that you´re okay with it. > > I thought your only concern was the not allowed use of pkt_duration. > > I am ok in principle with a patch that uses the frame rate instead of > the correct final timestamp. But not any such patch. > > I am not ok with a patch that makes the code more complex. I will at > some point start again working on this, and any extra code complexity > will make my life harder. > > In particular, I am never ok with a patch that copy-pastes and > duplicates a non-trivial block of code. > > In fact, even if your patch was perfect in its logic, i.e. used the > correct final timestamp, I would reject it based on the code complexity > and duplication. > > As I said : the moment you used the "copy" feature of your editor on a > non-trivial block of code, you should have stopped and taken a step back > to look at the big picture. >
I´m afraid the big picture might be to big for me. The only thing I see that could be factored out is the delta for loop. And even this would need much more investigation and testing form my side. Unfortunately my time is too limited atm. I think I understand your position, so I hope one day you will find the time for the right fix. Regards, Thomas _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
