On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 15:34:26 +0200, Nicolas George wrote:
> > +static inline double get_motion_avg(double motion_sum, uint64_t nb_frames)
> > +{
> > +    return motion_sum / nb_frames;
> > +}
> 
> Is it really useful as a separate function?

It's the same style as in all the previous filters submitted by Ashish,
BTW. (Just saying, no judgment.)

> > +    if (!(s->ref_data = av_malloc(data_sz))) {
> > +        av_log(ctx, AV_LOG_ERROR, "ref_buf allocation failed.\n");
> 
> > +        return AVERROR(EINVAL);
> 
> The correct return code would be ENOMEM.

Ditto. I had noticed but wasn't sure, and didn't have anything else to
say. I'm just saying, the learnings from these remarks can be taken for
the other filters an well.

Moritz
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

Reply via email to