Le tridi 3 thermidor, an CCXXV, Derek Buitenhuis a écrit : > +1 on exposing it as side data; it's consistent with previous APIs and doesn't
I will not oppose further; I do not buy the "Yet Another Field" argument
but I will debunk it another time.
> FWIW, literally every other library exposes ICC data the same way (as a dumb
> buffer), and it's IMO the most reasonable. It's not reasonable to put an
> actual
> description of ICC data in the doxy (see: 300 page spec... it is
> complictated).
> Just a reference to the spec is fine.
I fully agree. I suggest something along the lines:
The data contains an ICC profile as an opaque octet buffer
following the format described at $url with an optional name
defined in the metadata entry "name".
Regards,
--
Nicolas George
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
