On 2017/8/10 6:14, Mark Thompson wrote: > On 02/08/17 06:57, Jun Zhao wrote: >> From 82eb7d1c3120081a7073cfb379802a28c769ae18 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> From: Jun Zhao <jun.z...@intel.com> >> Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2017 23:07:34 -0400 >> Subject: [PATCH V2 4/4] lavc/vaapi_encode_h265: respect "slices" option in >> h265 vaapi encoder >> >> Enable multi-slice support in AVC/H.265 vaapi encoder. >> >> Signed-off-by: Wang, Yi A <yi.a.w...@intel.com> >> Signed-off-by: Jun Zhao <jun.z...@intel.com> >> --- >> libavcodec/vaapi_encode_h265.c | 42 >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ >> 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/libavcodec/vaapi_encode_h265.c b/libavcodec/vaapi_encode_h265.c >> index cf6b9388d1..aa85331260 100644 >> --- a/libavcodec/vaapi_encode_h265.c >> +++ b/libavcodec/vaapi_encode_h265.c >> @@ -176,6 +176,10 @@ typedef struct VAAPIEncodeH265Context { >> unsigned int ctu_width; >> unsigned int ctu_height; >> >> + int slice_of_ctus; >> + int slice_mod_ctus; >> + int last_ctu_index; >> + >> int fixed_qp_idr; >> int fixed_qp_p; >> int fixed_qp_b; >> @@ -962,6 +966,7 @@ static int >> vaapi_encode_h265_init_picture_params(AVCodecContext *avctx, >> VAEncPictureParameterBufferHEVC *vpic = pic->codec_picture_params; >> VAAPIEncodeH265Context *priv = ctx->priv_data; >> int i; >> + int max_slices; >> >> if (pic->type == PICTURE_TYPE_IDR) { >> av_assert0(pic->display_order == pic->encode_order); >> @@ -1024,7 +1029,22 @@ static int >> vaapi_encode_h265_init_picture_params(AVCodecContext *avctx, >> av_assert0(0 && "invalid picture type"); >> } >> >> - pic->nb_slices = 1; >> + max_slices = 1; >> + if (ctx->max_slices) { >> + max_slices = FFMIN(priv->ctu_height, ctx->max_slices); >> + if (avctx->slices > max_slices) { >> + av_log(avctx, AV_LOG_WARNING, "The max slices number per frame " >> + "cannot more than %d.\n", max_slices); >> + } else { >> + max_slices = avctx->slices; >> + } >> + } >> + >> + pic->nb_slices = max_slices; >> + >> + priv->slice_of_ctus = (priv->ctu_width * priv->ctu_height) / >> pic->nb_slices; >> + priv->slice_mod_ctus = (priv->ctu_width * priv->ctu_height) % >> pic->nb_slices; >> + priv->last_ctu_index = 0; >> >> return 0; >> } >> @@ -1047,9 +1067,11 @@ static int >> vaapi_encode_h265_init_slice_params(AVCodecContext *avctx, >> pslice = slice->priv_data; >> mslice = &pslice->misc_slice_params; >> >> - // Currently we only support one slice per frame. >> - vslice->slice_segment_address = 0; >> - vslice->num_ctu_in_slice = priv->ctu_width * priv->ctu_height; >> + vslice->slice_segment_address = priv->last_ctu_index; >> + vslice->num_ctu_in_slice = priv->slice_of_ctus + (priv->slice_mod_ctus >> > 0 ? 1 : 0); >> + if (priv->slice_mod_ctus > 0) >> + priv->slice_mod_ctus--; >> + priv->last_ctu_index += vslice->num_ctu_in_slice; >> >> switch (pic->type) { >> case PICTURE_TYPE_IDR: >> @@ -1103,9 +1125,13 @@ static int >> vaapi_encode_h265_init_slice_params(AVCodecContext *avctx, >> else >> vslice->slice_qp_delta = priv->fixed_qp_idr - vpic->pic_init_qp; >> >> - vslice->slice_fields.bits.last_slice_of_pic_flag = 1; >> + if (priv->last_ctu_index == priv->ctu_width * priv->ctu_height) >> + vslice->slice_fields.bits.last_slice_of_pic_flag = 1; >> >> - mslice->first_slice_segment_in_pic_flag = 1; >> + if (vslice->slice_segment_address == 0) >> + mslice->first_slice_segment_in_pic_flag = 1; >> + else >> + mslice->first_slice_segment_in_pic_flag = 0; >> >> if (pic->type == PICTURE_TYPE_IDR) { >> // No reference pictures. >> @@ -1198,6 +1224,10 @@ static av_cold int >> vaapi_encode_h265_configure(AVCodecContext *avctx) >> av_assert0(0 && "Invalid RC mode."); >> } >> >> + if (!ctx->max_slices && avctx->slices > 0) >> + av_log(avctx, AV_LOG_WARNING, "The encode slice option is not " >> + "supported with this VAAPI version.\n"); >> + >> return 0; >> } >> >> -- >> 2.11.0 >> > > All the same comments as the H.264 patch. > > Also, you might want to consider whether you can/should set > pps_loop_filter_across_slices_enabled_flag. (And > disable_deblocking_filter_idc in H.264, which I didn't think of there.)
I think we can enable "deblock/no-deblock" option like x264 after mutil-slice finish for this, is it Ok? > > - Mark > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel > _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel