On 8/19/17, Nicolas George <geo...@nsup.org> wrote: > Le duodi 2 fructidor, an CCXXV, Paul B Mahol a écrit : >> I like idea of having single A/V filter to do this job, not combinations >> where >> users might become confused. > > I do not agree. Adding yet another filter causes confusion in itself. > Not counting the extra boilerplate code (I suggest you permanently > disable the copy-paste feature of your development editor ;-). > Documenting the combination would have the same result.
You completely ignored and removed other aspects of my reply. > > Furthermore, having this in a single filter would possibly cause the > misapprehension that something special happens there, while in truth it > is no different from two individual filters. Something special, like one can control both audio and video aspect at once and provide same info to output. > > Also, two individual filters would be able to run in separate threads > when filter-level threading will be implemented. *when* Also that matter less. > > Regards, > > -- > Nicolas George > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel > _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel