On Mon, 4 Sep 2017 19:40:25 +0200 Michael Niedermayer <mich...@niedermayer.cc> wrote:
> My thought, if its less energy intensive than what we have then its > worth having. > A tiny contribution to reducing carbon emissions ... Removing some fringe codecs/filters and FATE test would contribute a LOT to this. Currently, Libav is way more ecofriendly than FFmpeg, because it builds and runs FATE in much shorter time (given same CPU usage). I'm not sure why your fork hates nature so much. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
