On 9/11/2017 1:59 PM, Nicolas George wrote: > Le quartidi 24 fructidor, an CCXXV, James Almer a écrit : >> Maybe it should be its own subsystem entry with the filters stating the >> dependency in configure instead? It's used by enough filters by now to >> justify that. > > I do not oppose, but what would be the benefit?
Cleaner Makefile, removing a lot of repeated objects on every filter dependency entry. Same reason why so many "Subsystem" entries exist in libavcodec. Is the idea that every filter will eventually use framesync2 in the long run, or will it not be used by some? If the latter I'll cook up a patch to make framesync2 a lavfi configure time dependency. Otherwise lets just add it to the unconditional OBJS list. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
