On 23 September 2017 at 03:08, Ricardo Constantino <wiia...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On 23 September 2017 at 00:46, Rostislav Pehlivanov <atomnu...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > On 12 April 2017 at 23:26, Rostislav Pehlivanov <atomnu...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > Here's the latest version, which I consider to be non-WIP now.
> > I plan to push it tomorrow morning if there are no objections.
> >
>
> This commit implement a psychoacoustic system for the native Opus
>
> implements*
>
> > encoder. Its unlike any other psychoacoustic system known since its
> >
> It's unlike any other psychoacoustic system known, since it's
>
> > capable of using a lookahead to make better choices on how to treat the
> > current frame and how many bits to allocate for it (and future frames).
> > Also, whilst the main bulk of the analysis function has to run in a
> > single thread, the per-frame anaylsis functions do not modify the main
> >
> analysis*; does not*
>
> > psychoacoustic context, so in the future it will be fairly trivial to
> > run those as slice threads.
>
>
>
> > _______________________________________________
> > ffmpeg-devel mailing list
> > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
> > http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> ffmpeg-devel mailing list
> ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
> http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
>


Pushed with your suggestions, thanks
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

Reply via email to