On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 11:34:18AM +0200, wm4 wrote: > On Wed, 4 Oct 2017 11:22:37 +0200 > Michael Niedermayer <mich...@niedermayer.cc> wrote: > > > On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 09:12:29AM +0200, wm4 wrote: > > > On Tue, 3 Oct 2017 21:40:58 +0200 > > > Michael Niedermayer <mich...@niedermayer.cc> wrote: > > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 03, 2017 at 03:15:13PM +0200, wm4 wrote: > > > > > From: Anton Khirnov <an...@khirnov.net> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Use the AVFrame.opaque_ref field. The original user's opaque_ref is > > > > > wrapped in the lavc struct and then unwrapped before the frame is > > > > > returned to the caller. > > > > > > > > this is a ugly hack > > > > > > > > one and the same field should not be used to hold both the > > > > users opaque_ref as well as a structure which is itself not a user > > > > opaque_ref > > > > > > While the AVFrame is within libavcodec, it's libavcodec's frame, not > > > the user's. Thus your claim doesn't make too much sense. libavcodec > > > fully controls the meaning for its own AVFrames' opaque_ref, but > > > reconstruct the user's value when returning it. > > > > i disagree > > Well, you're wrong anyway. > > > such hacks should not be added, we do have enough hacks already > > It's not a hack.
please accept my veto to this patch.
also, please stop sending me insults.
* Loaded log from Sun Feb 26 13:41:05 2017
11:34 <wm4> I don't want to hear this from the king of ugly hacks
thanks
[...]
--
Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
Republics decline into democracies and democracies degenerate into
despotisms. -- Aristotle
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
