On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 07:55:52PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 11:47:21AM +0200, Tobias Rapp wrote:
> > According to EBU tech 3285 supplement 3 the dwPosPeakOfPeaks field
> > should contain the absolute position to the maximum audio sample value,
> > but the current implementation writes the relative peak frame index
> > instead.
> > 
> > Fix the issue by writing the "unknown" value (-1) for now until the
> > feature is implemented correctly.
> > 
> > Previous version reviewed-by: Peter Bubestinger <p.bubestin...@av-rd.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Tobias Rapp <t.r...@noa-archive.com>
> > ---
> > v2:
> >  - added version micro bump
> >  - more code clean-up
> > 
> >  libavformat/version.h        |  2 +-
> >  libavformat/wavenc.c         | 11 +----------
> >  tests/ref/lavf/wav_peak      |  2 +-
> >  tests/ref/lavf/wav_peak_only |  2 +-
> >  4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 
> will apply, thanks

rather LGTM, feel free to apply

thx

[...]

-- 
Michael     GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

I am the wisest man alive, for I know one thing, and that is that I know
nothing. -- Socrates

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

Reply via email to