2017-11-20 9:17 GMT+01:00 刘歧 <l...@chinaffmpeg.org>:
>> 在 2017年11月20日,15:59,Jeyapal, Karthick <kjeya...@akamai.com> 写道:
>>> On 11/20/17, 1:01 PM, "刘歧" <l...@chinaffmpeg.org> wrote:
>>>> 在 2017年11月8日,17:22,Karthick J <kjeya...@akamai.com> 写道:
>>>> +    { "http_user_agent", "override User-Agent field in HTTP header",
>>>>  OFFSET(user_agent), AV_OPT_TYPE_STRING, {.str = NULL}, 0, 0, E},
>>> What about dash_user_agent? The reason is http_user_agent maybe get
>>> mean HTTP Protocol user_agent, but this is used in dashenc.
>> I kept http_user_agent to maintain uniformity with hlsenc option.
>> http://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2017-September/215642.html
>> In that way, irrespective of hls or dash output format, http_user_agent
>> would apply for both.
> that should modify to hls_user_agent too. because that is clarified the option
> is used in dash or hls, isn’t it?

I consider it a huge advantage for users if options in different modules use
the same option name if they do the same thing.

Is it possible to create confusion if the options share the same name?

Carl Eugen
ffmpeg-devel mailing list

Reply via email to