On 11/20/17, Jim DeLaHunt <from.ffmpeg-...@jdlh.com> wrote: > On 2017-11-20 05:18, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: >> 2017-11-19 11:27 GMT+01:00 Jim DeLaHunt <from.ffmpeg-...@jdlh.com>: >>> Looking in the ffmpeg-cvslog archives >>> <http://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-cvslog/>, it's clear that diffs of >>> many, >>> possibly all, commits are sent there. But I see no evidence there of >>> discussion since 2011 >>> (though I might have missed something). >> You have. > Thank you for that 1 bit of data. Telling me what I missed would be even > more helpful. > > But do you have a response to top-level questions: > > On 2017-11-19 02:27, Jim DeLaHunt wrote: >> >> ...Is it really accurate that every contributor is expected to subscribe >> to the ffmpeg-cvslog list? That "Bugs and possible improvements or >> general questions regarding commits are discussed there"? >> >> Or, would it be more accurate to change the title of this section to >> read "ffmpeg-devel"? And, to reword the "diffs of all commits are >> sent there" text to better describe ffmpeg-devel? >> > Looking forward to your thoughts.
Not at all. To be a contributor, it is not needed to subscribe to that list. Hopefully you consider this answer helpfull. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list firstname.lastname@example.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel