On Sun, Dec 03, 2017 at 07:58:18PM +0000, Stefan _ wrote: > On 01.12.2017 at 17:45 Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > AVDISCARD_NONREF is about frames which are not referenced by any other > > doesnt ff_hevc_frame_nb_refs() produce the number of references curently > > aka the other end of the reference arrows ? > > Yes, that sounds right. > > I've revised the patch to check for *_N NAL unit types instead (which > should be equivalent to H.264's nal_idc == 0) and to skip not only > deblock, but also SAO. >
> doc/decoders.texi | 7 ------- > libavcodec/hevc_filter.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- > 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > d0c4c6a91d7222fd9f370bd213e1075d7551463b > 0001-libavcodec-hevc_filter-support-for-all-skip_loop_fil.patch > From a3ebeb4ca0849cfc3846de79b38ae5ca6c001718 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: sfan5 <sf...@live.de> > Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2017 23:58:02 +0100 > Subject: [PATCH] libavcodec/hevc_filter: support for all skip_loop_filter > levels. > > Continues where commit 52c75d486ed5f75cbb79e5dbd07b7aef24f3071f left off. > --- > doc/decoders.texi | 7 ------- > libavcodec/hevc_filter.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- > 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) will apply can you add a fate test for this ? thanks [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB Rewriting code that is poorly written but fully understood is good. Rewriting code that one doesnt understand is a sign that one is less smart then the original author, trying to rewrite it will not make it better.
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list firstname.lastname@example.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel