On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 3:25 PM, Derek Buitenhuis
<derek.buitenh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 12/5/2017 11:00 PM, Jacob Trimble wrote:
>> Also, can I use the flexible array member feature, it was introduced
>> in C99?  Would a 0-length array be better?
> No, I don't think this would be OK inside a public header, unfortunately.

Would a 0-length array work?  Otherwise I would need to have it be a
1-length array and have to account for that when calculating the size
to allocate; it would also require a comment to ignore the size of the

The reason I want it to be an array is because I want a variable
number of elements, but I want the data contained in the struct.
Since this will be extra data, AFAIK it will only be free()'d, so I
can't use pointers or it will leak.

Another alternative would be to still malloc more than needed and have
the memory past the struct be the array.  That seems like a hack, but
would allow a simple free().  For example:

info = malloc(sizeof(AVPacketEncryptionInfo) +
sizeof(AVPacketSubsampleInfo) * num_subsamples);
info.subsamples = (uint8_t*)info + sizeof(AVPacketEncryptionInfo);
ffmpeg-devel mailing list

Reply via email to