Paul B Mahol (2017-12-10):
> For increased tempo it have much better quality.
> For decreased tempo is have similar quality.
> Also it have more options and is more configurable
> and have increased range of tempo scaling.

Is there any benefit in atempo, then?

If not, then this filter should replace atempo, but keeping the name,
and as much as possible the options, for maximum convenience for users.


  Nicolas George

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

ffmpeg-devel mailing list

Reply via email to