On Mon, 25 Dec 2017 10:44:40 +0000 Rostislav Pehlivanov <atomnu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 25 December 2017 at 06:50, wm4 <nfx...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, 25 Dec 2017 02:12:38 +0000 > > Rostislav Pehlivanov <atomnu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Signed-off-by: Rostislav Pehlivanov <atomnu...@gmail.com> > > > --- > > > doc/APIchanges | 5 +++++ > > > libavresample/avresample.h | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----- > > > 2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/doc/APIchanges b/doc/APIchanges > > > index df79758e86..96fad416d5 100644 > > > --- a/doc/APIchanges > > > +++ b/doc/APIchanges > > > @@ -15,6 +15,11 @@ libavutil: 2017-10-21 > > > > > > API changes, most recent first: > > > > > > +2017-xx-xx - xxxxxxx - lavr 4.0.0 - avresample.h > > > + Deprecate the entire library. It was unmaintained and redundant > > > + as libswresample did everything it did better, faster, with more > > > + control and with a better, slightly higher level API. > > > + > > > > I don't strongly disagree with the wording and also with the > > "deprecation", and I think we should build avr by default instead. > > _______________________________________________ > > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > > http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel > > > > Suggest better wording then. > I strongly disagree with your suggestion to make avr the default. That Not the default, just build it by default. > would undermine all the work that's being and was done on making a better, > faster resampling library just because someone wants to keep compatibility > with a dead project. What you call "dead project" did basically all of the hardware transcoding improvements that were merged into ffmpeg. How very insincere of you. > For someone who's complaining about the codebase being full of junk you > sure seem lenient towards having 2 resampling libraries and 2 filters to do Had I been around, I'd have prevented libswresample, which was a bad NIH of libavresample. I think you should port all improvements to libavresample, and delete the redundant libswresample. But that would be a honest act! _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel