On Thu, Feb 01, 2018 at 01:51:17PM +0100, Jerome Martinez wrote: > On 05/01/2018 11:18, Jerome Martinez wrote: > >1 year without RGB48 related patches, tested by a couple of users, tested > >with a FFV1 conformance checker, I suggest that FFV1 RGB48 support in > >FFmpeg does not mandate anymore the user to add " -strict experimental" on > >the command line during encoding. > > Sorry, I missed the GBRP16 part. > I tested the encoding through GBRP16 pix_fmt (instead of RGB48 pix_fmt), and > it works fine too. > Additional patch for removing the need of " -strict experimental" for GBRP16 > too.
> ffv1enc.c | 4 ---- > 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-) > 1af1e3f7fb3a0e866285623d6f5f1e65bfcebba0 > 0001-avcodec-ffv1enc-mark-RGB48-support-as-non-experiment.patch > From 511e036499f716b14fed7ec07d2d8ccf18936444 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: =?UTF-8?q?J=C3=A9r=C3=B4me=20Martinez?= <jer...@mediaarea.net> > Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2018 13:15:54 +0100 > Subject: [PATCH] avcodec/ffv1enc: mark RGB48 support as non-experimental > > Remove the 2nd mark, 1st mark was removed in 58e16a4 > --- > libavcodec/ffv1enc.c | 4 ---- > 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-) will apply [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB The real ebay dictionary, page 1 "Used only once" - "Some unspecified defect prevented a second use" "In good condition" - "Can be repaird by experienced expert" "As is" - "You wouldnt want it even if you were payed for it, if you knew ..."
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list email@example.com http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel