On Thu, 8 Feb 2018 10:29:11 +0000 Rostislav Pehlivanov <atomnu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 8 February 2018 at 01:08, Muhammad Faiz <mfc...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 7:35 AM, James Almer <jamr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 2/7/2018 9:32 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > >> On Wed, Feb 07, 2018 at 09:07:39PM +0000, Josh de Kock wrote: > > >>> Yes, my bad. It looked like it worked initially (was more > > >>> worried about getting a fix out quickly), but it didnt. Try this one. > > >>> > > >>> --- > > >>> fftools/cmdutils.c | 104 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > > ----------------------- > > >>> 1 file changed, 58 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-) > > >> > > >> I dont know if this is supposed to fix the other lists > > >> but > > >> ./ffmpeg -demuxers > > >> still returns nonsense with this patch > > >> > > >> File formats: > > >> D. = Demuxing supported > > >> .E = Muxing supported > > >> -- > > >> E 3dostr 3DO STR > > >> E 4xm 4X Technologies > > >> ... > > >> a while ago this was returned: > > >> > > >> File formats: > > >> D. = Demuxing supported > > >> .E = Muxing supported > > >> -- > > >> D 3dostr 3DO STR > > >> D 4xm 4X Technologies > > > > > > Perhaps cdc78058c78dfa4966758a342acd2c1f3b282c46 should be reverted > > > then. If the new API may actually get changed in the coming days once > > > some consensus is reached then there's no point trying to get this > > > working with things as is. > > > > +1. > > _______________________________________________ > > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > > http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel > > > > -1, there's no point in reverting this and then arguing for 3 weeks with > people who will never use the API in the first place, don't understand the > problem this patchset solved and just want to see their way be the only way > things are done. > We should fix this patch, fix another one if there's any and it'll be fine. +1 to this, but on the other hand this patch is just for code that _uses_ the new API, not the API itself. I seriously hope nobody is arguing for reverting the API as is. It didn't please everyone, but it's good and sufficient enough, and we were in a bikeshed stalemate. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel