On 3/3/2018 6:41 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > On Fri, Mar 02, 2018 at 08:16:11AM +0800, Jun Zhao wrote: >> > >> bitstream_filters.texi | 11 ++++++----- >> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) >> 27c05404d9fabe5065e418c4cc09629d53aee1a1 >> 0001-doc-bitstream_filters-correct-dump_extra-bsfs-docs.patch >> From 0a0a10824511ef9d5b3c49ee652a918603841826 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> From: Jun Zhao <jun.z...@intel.com> >> Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2018 13:53:05 +0800 >> Subject: [PATCH V2] doc/bitstream_filters: correct dump_extra bsfs docs. >> >> Update dump_extra bit stream filter docs to follow current >> code implement. >> >> Signed-off-by: Jun Zhao <jun.z...@intel.com> >> Reviewed-by: Steven Liu <l...@onvideo.cn> >> --- >> doc/bitstream_filters.texi | 11 ++++++----- >> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > i hoped a little that the a option could one day be > cleanly restored in the implementation. > but keeping the docs incorrect is not helping
You mean adding it as it's defined in the removed portion of the doxy from this patch (local_header flag2)? Sounds like a better idea, as it would help replace the av_parser_change() call in ffmpeg.c with this bsf. I'll take a look. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel