On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 9:52 PM, wm4 <nfx...@googlemail.com> wrote: > On Fri, 9 Mar 2018 13:31:45 -0300 > James Almer <jamr...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 3/9/2018 12:47 PM, Derek Buitenhuis wrote: >> > On 3/9/2018 3:22 PM, James Almer wrote: >> >> Yes, but it's slower, and the buffer is guaranteed to be written to with >> >> actual data after being allocated. >> >> >> >> This is a filter that may run once per processed packet, so the less >> >> overhead the better. >> > >> > Not sure I buy the "speed" argument here, but OK. >> > >> > - Derek >> >> There's really nothing to win zeroing then immediately writing actual >> data on top of it. >> > > Except code clarity and robustness?
We use this sort of pattern in all sorts of places where buffers are read and padded. Its clear enough. - Hendrik _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
