Martin Vignali (2018-03-18):
> I run the test again with a bigger width (512 instead of 128)
> This is my result :
> shuffle_bytes_0321_c: 128.6
> shuffle_bytes_0321_ssse3: 41.6
> shuffle_bytes_0321_avx2: 23.4

IIUC, these benchmarks are expressed in CPU cycles. But what James says
is that it can cause the CPU frequency to be throttled: if that happens,
less cycles can use more time, and even worse, cause other unrelated to
take more time. A benchmark in actual time and typical use case would be
needed to decide.

Regards,

-- 
  Nicolas George

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

Reply via email to