Jan Ekström (2018-04-18): > While I have kind of felt like this for a while now, I am just not > sure if we can find all the things where with or without mention > things have been poked to fix issues with it, which would now have to > all be reverted. Also we already angered API users once with this > change (albeit I'm not sure if it ever ended up in release yet?), so > I'm not sure if we want to do it again. Of course as I mentioned if > this was never in any release then that is kind of not relevant.
Might I ask how you propose to address the issue that required this change in the first place? The convention ret=0 for EOF does not work for packtized packets. We had complaints about issues caused by that. You cannot revert a solution that works unless you have one that work better in view. Regards, -- Nicolas George _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
