On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 12:53:46AM +0200, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: > 2018-05-16 0:29 GMT+02:00, Hendrik Leppkes <h.lepp...@gmail.com>: > > > It makes no real difference if its less efficient or whatever - > > if a codec specification asks for this behavior, then our > > decoders should act accordingly. > > I wonder where this suddenly comes from? > (I was away from my mail client when a similar argument > was used a few weeks ago and I forgot later.) > Luckily, many of our codecs do smarter things > than the specifications asks for... > > Do we have a specification for qtrle?
Iam only aware of the one "we", that is more correctly mike melanson wrote: https://multimedia.cx/qtrle.txt I think this invalidates the argument, so if i hear no objections then ill apply this patch in a few days thanks [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB Elect your leaders based on what they did after the last election, not based on what they say before an election.
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list email@example.com http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel