On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 12:53:46AM +0200, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> 2018-05-16 0:29 GMT+02:00, Hendrik Leppkes <h.lepp...@gmail.com>:
> > It makes no real difference if its less efficient or whatever -
> > if a codec specification asks for this behavior, then our
> > decoders should act accordingly.
> I wonder where this suddenly comes from?
> (I was away from my mail client when a similar argument
> was used a few weeks ago and I forgot later.)
> Luckily, many of our codecs do smarter things
> than the specifications asks for...
> Do we have a specification for qtrle?

Iam only aware of the one "we", that is more correctly mike melanson
wrote: https://multimedia.cx/qtrle.txt

I think this invalidates the argument, so if i hear no objections then
ill apply this patch in a few days


Michael     GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

Elect your leaders based on what they did after the last election, not
based on what they say before an election.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

ffmpeg-devel mailing list

Reply via email to