Michael Niedermayer wrote: >I think future work should be done as FFV1v5 v6 v7 on >CELLAR/IETF
That is how it should be, in my opinion. >why you ask ? >because that way >its on its way to be a proper IETF standard from day 1 >there are already people who are interrested in this there, >like myself and IIRC reto, and iam sure there are many more who >would like to see more discussions about improving and >extending the codecs in more fundamental ways. Indeed, you remember correctly. >also, you get more comments and testing on IETF/CELLAR >and for work beyond ffv1v3/4 to be successfull a critical mass >of people / time is needed. If everyone works seperate, which >it seems a bit to me thats what is happening, it would be >harder to move such an effort to completion I plenty agree with you! The reason why I worked more alone is the not welcoming environment. I am really too ill now and I do not have anymore the energy for just ignoring the insults. If you have any concrete idea how the environment could be made more welcoming, I would be more than happy. (I am not thinking about another code of conduct ;-) I would like to continue the FFV1 journey with you and other interested people, because it could be a fascinating one! Best regards, Reto _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
