On 9/17/18, Carl Eugen Hoyos <ceffm...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2018-09-17 9:58 GMT+02:00, Paul B Mahol <one...@gmail.com>: >> Also why this codec needs fuzzing? > > Do you believe that this codec is a less likely attack vector > than any other codec?
It is not possible attack vector at al, becuase there are no security bugs in this codec that can be fixed in its code. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
