> Can you confirm that if you break the decoder intentionally, the test > (still) fails? > > Thank you, Carl Eugen
It does. Since file now writes 1 extra packet (as intended) so it'll always differ SIZE_TOLERANCE at min, so decoder changes will go over than value, I think. I tried -frames:a 108 (the original file has 108 packets, but now I output 109) so it wouldn't need SIZE_TOLERANZE, but I couldn't get FATE to use it. If I manually decode with frames:a 108 and compare old decoder vs new decode, files are identical. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
