From: Vittorio Giovara [mailto:vittorio.giov...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, October 22, 2018 12:30 PM To: Guo, Yejun <yejun....@intel.com> Cc: FFmpeg development discussions and patches <ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH V3] Add a filter implementing HDR image reconstruction from a single exposure using deep CNNs
On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 4:19 AM Guo, Yejun <yejun....@intel.com<mailto:yejun....@intel.com>> wrote: + .description = NULL_IF_CONFIG_SMALL("HDR image reconstruction from a single exposure using deep CNNs."), > why "reconstruction"? there is nothing to construct back if the source wasn't > hdr to begin with > "tonemap" is probably a better term here, in my opinion > same for previous uses there is more detail data generated with the dnn model, the model accepts sdr frame and generates hdr data. see more detail in paper @https://arxiv.org/pdf/1710.07480.pdf, and the description comes from the title of this paper. > Thanks for the link, however i'm still not sold on the term. You "generate" > hdr data, not "reconstruct": it's generated/estimated/made up data, not data > that is lost and needs to be reconstrcuted. I suggested "tonemap" because > you're mapping SDR tones (aka colors) to HDR ones, and that seems the right > term to use. If you really dislike it, at least consider "HDR image > generation from a single exposure using deep CNNs" which would work much > better. got your point, it’s nice, thanks, will choose ‘generation’ -- Vittorio _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
