> > > What if a majority of the committee is biased and bans everyone they > disagree with to take over the project? They certainly could. > What if the committee's decision is something the majority of the > developers disagree with? > > This is why I'm against formalizing such prodecures. They're too inflexible > and absolute, and end up being abused or overused (like videolan's weekly > temporary bannings I've heard of). > Furthermore why do you bring this up now at all? We haven't had accidents > of this nature in quite some time. In fact the last time it was the ML > admin's random incorrect decision to block a discussion which ended up > being a problem that everyone disagreed with. And that was 11 months ago
Thank you for confirming to the rest of the community why we need a committee and proper Code of Conduct like other comparable Open Source projects. Kieran _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel