2018-12-03 21:28 GMT+01:00, Martin Vignali <martin.vign...@gmail.com>: >> > >> >> > >> It appears to me that NewTek abused our willingness to add an >> > >> optional >> > >> external nonfree library, I don't see many better options. See Ticket >> > >> #7589 and a blog post by a NewTek engineer confirming the issue. >> > >> >> > >> Patch untested. >> > >> >> > >> Please comment, Carl Eugen >> > > >> > > This patch looks wrong to me. > > It's seems like removing features for personal opinion.
This is a lie. (I don't care.) > Ticket 7589, mention an incorrect build redistribution. > > So, right way to fix this ticket, will be (for people interesting in this > kind of thing) > to indicate, what need to be done, in order to have a licence compliant > build. Again: What message would this send to future license violators? Since you are throwing accusations: Please remind me how many license violations you have worked on. Carl Eugen _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel