On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 5:04 PM Gresserman Dmitrij <dmitrij.gresser...@loewe.de> wrote: > > I fully agree with your approach and already thought about this. Parsing this > directly to a structure would the correct approach for a final future patch. > Unfortunately at this point in development, i need the most flexibility > possible, with simultaneously minimal reaction time. >
Since adding new types like this is basically public API, with certain stability guarantees once added, we prefer proper solutions, instead of quick hacks, otherwise we'll be dragging it around for years to come. - Hendrik _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
