On Sun, Feb 10, 2019 at 7:40 PM Jean-Baptiste Kempf <j...@videolan.org> wrote: > > On Sun, 10 Feb 2019, at 19:37, Werner Robitza wrote: > > > Those options are just for non-free cases, and to be honest, I don't see > > > why FFmpeg should advertise those. > > > > That is not correct. The following options/dependencies are not > > present in Homebrew core: > > > > chromaprint, fdk-aac, game-music-emu, libbs2b, libcaca, libgsm, > > libmodplug, librsvg, libssh, libvidstab, libvmaf, openh264, openssl, > > srt, two-lame, wavpack, webp, zeromq, zimg > > Fair enough. > I still object to an official recipe activating non-free options.
If that is the major concern, I suggest to remove these two options from the formula as a way forward. Of course, anyone would be free to provide their own non-free repository if they desire so. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel