On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 2:17 AM Sun, Jing A <jing.a....@intel.com> wrote:
> -----Original Message----- > From: ffmpeg-devel [mailto:ffmpeg-devel-boun...@ffmpeg.org] On Behalf Of > Jing SUN > Sent: Monday, March 11, 2019 6:38 PM > To: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > Cc: Sun, Jing A <jing.a....@intel.com>; Huang, Zhengxu < > zhengxu.hu...@intel.com>; Jun Zhao <jun.z...@intel.com>; Tmar, Hassene < > hassene.t...@intel.com> > Subject: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v7 1/2] lavc/svt_hevc: add libsvt hevc > encoder wrapper. > > From: Jing Sun <jing.a....@intel.com> > > base on patch by Huang, Zhengxu from https://github.com/intel/SVT-HEVC > > V4: - Fix the build error with new API in PR#52 > - Fix the encoding hang issue by API change in PR#52 > - Fix the last frame dropping issue > - Fix the invalid parameter causing segmentation fault issue > - Add the support to svt hevc and av1 plugins coexistance > - Add the VMAF optimized mode to "-tune" > - Add the "-hdr" parameter > > V3: - Fix the build error with new API > > V2: - Change the config options (didn't need to enable-gpl for BSD+Patent, > it's can compatible with LGPL2+, thanks Xavier correct this part), > now just need to "--enable-libsvthevc" option > - Add force_idr option > - Remove default GoP size setting in the wrapper, SVT-HEVC will calc > the the GoP size internal > - Refine the code as the FFmpeg community's comments > (https://patchwork.ffmpeg.org/patch/11347/) > > V1: - base on patch by Huang, Zhengxu, then refine some code. > all this version history should be in the email thread but not in the commit section in my opinion > > Change-Id: If0dcc5044ab9effd6847a8f48797b985d02b0816 > this id means nothing in ffmpeg git, I'd suggest dropping it > Signed-off-by: Huang, Zhengxu <zhengxu.hu...@intel.com> > Signed-off-by: hassene <hassene.t...@intel.com> > Should there be a real name here? > Signed-off-by: Jun Zhao <jun.z...@intel.com> > Signed-off-by: Jing Sun <jing.a....@intel.com> > Signed-off-by: Jing SUN <jing.a....@intel.com> > double sign-off? --- > [..] > -- > 1.8.3.1 > > Hi maintainers, > > A week has passed and no negative comment is received except a new feature > request, which will be considered in the next version. Is the first version > good to be picked? > Until that feature request is added, there should be a warning about that missing missing feature IMO. -- Vittorio _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel