Am 21.03.19 um 11:55 schrieb Michael Niedermayer: > On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 05:41:31PM -0400, Ronald S. Bultje wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 4:15 PM Gyan <ffm...@gyani.pro> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On 21-03-2019 01:32 AM, Marton Balint wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, 20 Mar 2019, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Wed, 20 Mar 2019, at 20:52, Marton Balint wrote: >>>>>> On Wed, 20 Mar 2019, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, 20 Mar 2019, at 19:34, Marton Balint wrote: >>>>>>>> As I described in similar threads before, whether or not the >>>>>> project want >> closed source support for NDI is a subjective issue, >>>>>> please start a vote >> about the removal of libndi if you want to >>>>>> seek this through. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The removal of libndi is actually done and committed. >>>>>> >>>>>> That is just sad an unfair. >>>>> >>>>> Sad, maybe. >>>>> Unfair, I disagree. If NDI wants to be in, they know what to do. >>>> >>>> It is unfair towards the people who expressied disapproval, yet this >>>> change was committed without neither vote nor consensus. >>> >>> +1. This was a political decision, not a technical one. A formal(-ish) >>> survey should have happened on the ML. >>> >> >> I agree we need a formal vote on this. I would like to set a wider project >> policy w.r.t. closed-source software integration, this is just one instance >> of a more general issue.
> I think there should have been a vote before pushing a commit as there where > FFmpeg developers objecting to it. > Ignoring people causes nothing good. Had there been a vote people would be > alot less upset about it as everyones oppinion would be counted equally > > It makes me unhappy that one FFmpeg developer apparently decided to leave > the project already because of this. > I think we should fix this, make a proper policy, with a proper vote > and then hopefully noone feels the need to leave. +1 >> >> Who wants to organize it? > > Thilo organized the last vote, maybe he wants to do it ? > but if noone else wants to do it i can do one too if people want and > there is consensus who can vote > If i search for "open source vote free" on google it points to > vote.heliosvoting.org as first hit > this seems rather basic but for simple yes/no questions it could work > maybe someone has a better suggestion we could use for more complex future > cases that is multiple choice votes in teh future (schulze STV / CPO-STV > for multiwinner or ScottishSTV (used by SPI), schulze method (used by debian) > for one winner of N choices would be nice to have) Including for simple yes/no votes we can use the same LimeSurvey host we got provided from KDE for the survey. Also for anonymous votes. If people want it, we can setup a poll anytime. Most important would be a list of people allowed to vote (as of mail subscribed to FFmpeg-devel). -Thilo _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".