On 4/13/2019 5:44 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: > 2019-04-10 21:47 GMT+02:00, Carl Eugen Hoyos <ceffm...@gmail.com>: >> 2019-04-09 20:32 GMT+02:00, James Almer <jamr...@gmail.com>: >>> Fixes ticket #7174. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: James Almer <jamr...@gmail.com> >>> --- >>> This makes what's essentially a non spec compliant >>> stream decodable again with no visual artifacts, and >>> without reintroducing the risk of overflows. >> >> Your patch leads to bit-exact output with the reference >> decoder and old FFmpeg. > > This is true for the original sample, the new sample > zNqp.h264 has bit-exact output with old FFmpeg > but not with your patch.
Where can i get this sample? Perhaps clipping the bogus value will make it bitexact. It would be nice to know what the reference decoder does, for that matter. If it's bothering like us to check and handle this out of spec values, or if they do like we used to and just pass them through. > > Carl Eugen > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel > > To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email > ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe". > _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
