2019-04-16 0:00 GMT+02:00, Tomas Härdin <tjop...@acc.umu.se>: > mån 2019-04-15 klockan 12:40 +0200 skrev Carl Eugen Hoyos: >> > 2019-04-15 10:30 GMT+02:00, Tomas Härdin <tjop...@acc.umu.se>: >> > This isn't likely to be a huge problem, but it allows us to reason more >> > about run-in. It also exposes my gripe about klv_read_packet() using >> > mxf_read_sync() >> >> Does this patch have an effect on one of our samples? > > It passes FATE if that's what you mean.
No. > The intent is rather to pre-emptively stop the ability for new > broken muxers to pop up, which would end up straying > from the spec because mxfdec.c is being too forgiving As such, and if I don't misunderstand, this sounds to me like an explanation why this patch should not be pushed. Carl Eugen _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
