On Thu, Apr 18, 2019, at 1:25 PM, Hendrik Leppkes wrote: > > Did you try the "wrap" option? As I understand it, it would preserve > the original mail entirely, and rely on the mail client of the > recipient (ie. us) to properly unwrap the MIME container. > We've had various problems of authorship in patches getting mangled by > this, so if that could prevent it, that would be useful.
I did not. At the time it seemed more problematic than munge, but I did not foresee the patchwork issue with munge. But we can certainly give it a try if you like. I'm not sure how patchwork will handle it. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".